Arkiv för December, 2015

Radiant Pilliga

Postad i kategorin: CSG, Mining den 15 December, 2015

1 people like this post.

”I’ll pick you up six-six thirty” he said, but already half past five I see the white ute speed down the dusty road to Pilliga Pottery. I stay at the “Poet’s cottage”, a house and bush setting as romantic as the name promises. The reason for getting up early is not quite as poetic. I have invited myself for a tour to monitor Santos Coal Seam Gas (CSG) facilities in the Pilliga forest. “I’m sorry I’m early, but they want as much time in the forest as possible before Santos’ workers get there.” PB says as I open the door. A group of activists from Lismore has stayed on their way to Canberra, where they a few days later would take part in the “People’s Parliament” action related to the climate talks in Paris. This group of activists have, I was told the night before, an infrared camera for gas leak detection. This is just days after the latest Pilliga bushfire, which is now supposed to be under control, but as I’ve been repeatedly told “no-one puts out a fire in the Pilliga, only rain does that”. (And as I write this, another fire has hit the area.) Leaking gas in this very bushfire prone area might gain quite a bit of attention.

It’s not often I catch the sun rise, but it’s a glorious morning. The world is beautiful in the early morning light, the air crisp and cool. Since the weather forecast spoke of 37 degrees, beating the sun is another reason to be up early. It’s a short drive to the newly established camp, which since this morning have had the dust covered with wood chips and been equipped with among other things solar panels, water tanks, a toilet and showers. I have some white box trees pointed out. The white box eucalyptus was a key player in the controversies surrounding Whitehaven’s coal mine in nearby Leard State Forest, which is home to the largest White-Box Grassy Woodland left in NSW, a type of ecosystem that once covered most of eastern Australia but now is deemed critically endangered. (My first encounter with white box was the White Box Honey I bought at the Parramatta farmer’s market, and I must confess it took me some time to realise that White Box is a type of tree, and not, well, a white box.)

It takes before we actually get going, people are packing, drinking coffee and go into town for fuel. This is my second tour of Santos Pilliga gas field, which is not a full scaled gas field. Santos have an exploration permit and about 30 pilot wells in the area. As they don’t have a production license, the wells are not supposed to produce gas. In the few weeks that has passed since that first tour of the fields, the rain has dried up and Santos has intensified work on their wells. One week earlier they begun moving in trucks and workers to the gas field, and this is why the camp is being established. As Santos’ increases their activity, so does the local anti-CSG movement.

When we get into the forest, I realise there is no infrared camera. There is a Geiger counter. While equipment to monitor gas leak is pretty straight forward in a gas field, the Geiger counter puzzles me. Radioactive gas? Apparently, the radioactive substance caesium-137 is used in the drill fluid. Back in Sydney, I find relatively recent news items from SMH and ABC on this, after all, there are few things with such a bad ring to it as “radioactive”. According to the Sydney Morning Herald, the US-based drilling company Halliburton is permitted to use cesium-137 in the drilling it does for Santos in the Pilliga.

Drillers deploy devices containing CS-137 to measure the composition of gas and water deep underground, with the isotope emitting gamma rays to operate like a miniature X-ray. Produced in nuclear reactors, the material is potentially deadly and among the main radiation concerns at failed power stations at Chernobyl and Fukushima.

Only small amounts are used in coal seam gas drilling, and the NSW Environment Protection said the isotope was also sometimes used in mining and construction, and strict rules were in place about its use. Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/environment/anticsg-groups-says-use-of-radioactive-materials-should-be-disclosed-20141123-11s5vp.html#ixzz3u6YnETMI

When the fire started last week Santos’ workers left the forest, but now they are back. The tour this morning is also part of the continuous monitoring the local anti-CSG activists do of Santos’ activities. We drive the red dirt roads, stopping at a water truck, gas wells, spill sites… The Geiger counter is counting, but the readings are not significant. “Not that I particularly would like to get a reading, but… it would serve some purposes” the counter handler LA says. This piece of equipment was donated to the movement, and they also have other crowdfunded equipment. Since this is very expensive equipment, and the infrared camera, present through is absence, even more so, it requires cooperation between different parts of this pretty diverse and spread out movement. (Lismore is a full day’s drive away.)

When we approach the first well, there is full activity. A guy in helmet and blue shirt approach the gate. “It’s cool, it’s Alex”, I’m told as PA walks up to talk to him. “Alex” is a hired security guy, and his instructions evidently includes filming us. Being filmed makes most of the company uneasy, but PA is calm: “He’s all right, just doing his job.” There’s even a bit of almost friendly chit-chat between them. Alex is filmed back. “He was at Gloucester too, right?” LA recognises him. “I guess Santos have a lot of footage of you?” I ask, and PA confirms with a grin.

Near the spill site, which years later still shows very little sign of life, there is a well with a giant flare. The cool of the morning is already replaced by a fierce sun and increasing heat. “Don’t tell me this is not a fire hazard” someone remarks. It is a huge open flame, and PA says it was even higher some nights before when it towered over the trees as they approached.

We drive through the area where the fire went through. In some parts, it does not appear to have burned so hot “looks like backburning” someone says, and PB concludes that this is actually a quite good fire from an ecological point of view. Fire was always a part of the Australian bush, and controlled burns a cornerstone Aboriginal land management practices. Many native species are remarkably well adapted to fire. As we get deeper into the burned area, the fire appears to have burned hotter and more destructively in some places. Here and there, smoke is still rising from the ground.

The fire and the flare, it turns out, is what is going to make the case. Not the radiation. Because while there actually is a significant reading at the last site we visit, the measurement must be done in a more controlled and legitimized way to have any impact. “This just shows us that there’s dangerous stuff, but we already know that” PA comments a few days later.

But the huge gas flare make the news. The footage PA took some nights before was incorporated in Independent Australia’s piece on it, and the Northern Daily Leader and The Land also ran stories on Santos flaring during a total fire ban. Mining operations are apparently exempt from the rules, and the NSW Rural Fire service does claim that the fire hazard from gas flares is minimal. But when a total fire ban means that harvest has to stop, or that there are strict regulations for lighting your backyard barbeque, allowing an open flame in the middle of a fire prone forest does seem a bit strange, to say the least. 20151130_42flame_IT


 

Breeza Harvest Festival

Postad i kategorin: Mining den 9 December, 2015

2 people like this post.

Workshop at Breeza Harvest Festival photo: David Torell www.vanpeltfoto.com

Workshop at Breeza Harvest Festival photo: David Torell www.vanpeltfoto.com

In early November 2015 a Harvest Festival was held on a farm outside Breeza in north western New South Wales, Australia. This is on the Liverpool plains, rich black-soil farmland which produces two crops every year, and on the fields around Breeza the winter crops of wheat are ripe and ready for harvest. However, the harvest is not the main theme of this festival, despite the name, instead, this gathering is a rally against plans for a coal mine in the area. Breeza farmer Andrew Pursehouse hosts the festival on one of his properties, the Ridge station, which is farmed by his son. Breeza Harvest Festival gathered a diverse crowd of farmers, environmentalists and indigenous groups. During the weekend, a number of workshops and plenary talks were held. The workshops focused on issues such as water, koalas and aboriginal heritage. And the invited speakers for the plenary sessions, (politicians, farmers, aboriginal elders) are all in agreement with one another. This is the wrong mine in the wrong place, as one of the weekend’s slogans went.

The festival was organised by the Liverpool Plains Alliance, an organiser as diverse as the crowd at the festival. Rallying around slogans such as “Dining not Mining”, the organisers are enthusiastic about the size of the crowd and keen to get the festival to “trend” in social media, promoting the hashtags #harfest #diningnotmining and testing the participants patience by endlessly retaking and rearranging photographs in blazing sunlight to get perfect exposure of the message. The festival did manage to attract some media attention, most notably from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), which in their report from the event also managed to capture some of our project crew!

The Liverpool Plains are sometimes called “Australia’s food bowl”, and the rich farmland has produced rich farmers. The areas the farms and stations comprise are enormous. And many families own not one, but several stations. This is a well established and well connected group, and several people tell us they have been reluctant to side with “greenies, hippies and aboriginies”. But as the backstage lobbying has not yielded the desired results, they are seeking new allies. While the union largely seem happy, tensions does surface during the weekend. These are groups between which there has previously been quite a bit of animosity, and their coming together is an interesting moment for rural Australia.

The farms themselves can be said to be the result an enclosure process. (Others would call the land stolen.) They are fenced off and surrounded by a “no trespassing” ethos (quite alien for a Swede). But the threat of extraction the proposed coal mine entails, would be enclosure taken a step further.  Most importantly, it threatens another common that land enclosure didn’t: the water. And the answer to the threat of extraction is an appeal to the common. As a threat to the food produced by land, as a threat to the koalas living on the land, as a threat to the water – the ever present water (Australia is a pretty dry place). Important in this context is also the aboriginal heritage which is threatened by the mine. And even the traditional custodians of this heritage appeals to the commons,  “this is your heritage too” as it is put during one of the workshops.

So while the ‘no trespass’ ideology of farmers might be far from the commons ethos, the new alliances requires a shift to emphasizing the common resources at stake. The slogans of the Australian anti-coal and gas movement stresses alternative uses of the land. It sees it not as an extractive resource. They are not interested in the coal or the gas, but in what the extraction of these resource might destroy.


 

Du tittar just nu i Commons and commoditiess arkiv för December, 2015.

Commons and Commodities

Commons and Commodities
Commons and Commodities är ett forskningsprojekt som undersöker hur gemensamma resurser, allmänningar, avgränsas och inhägnas – och det motstånd sådana processer möter. Vi studerar hur olika typer av allmänningar – både materiella och immateriella – på olika sätt privatiseras och inhägnas och hur detta påverkar de som brukar dem. Vi som skriver här heter Johanna Dahlin och Martin Fredriksson.

Common and Commodities is a research project which asks if, and how, the commons are rearticulated and enclosed as property. It aims to provide new knowledge about how different kinds of common resources are enclosed and commodified as private property, and how this affects those who use and manage those commons. Johanna Dahlin and Martin Fredriksson are writing.

Sök i bloggen

Sidor

Kategorier

Mest bloggat om

astronomy Coonabarabran CSG Light pollution Mining water

Arkiv

Metadata



Detta är en personlig webbsida och information framförd här representerar inte Linköpings universitet. Se även Policy för www-publicering vid Linköpings universitet.

This is a personal www page. Opinions expressed here do not represent the official views of Linköpings universitet. Please refer to Linköpings universitets wwwpolicy.



Commons and commodities drivs av WordPress